Posts: 65
	Threads: 6
	Joined: Sep 06, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:Usually when you are defining values there is an implied "equal to or less than", like if you are buying a video card and want to spend between 200 and 300$, that doesn't mean you can't spend EXACTLY 200$ or 300$.
Exactly like what I'm saying, your first paragraph said less than 2 but more than one, meaning that it's in between. And when talking about people (or creatures / living beings) for that matter, you can't have a decimal. Explain to me what the number below 2 but what above than one is? It has to be a whole number for your answer, since if I recall in kindergarden, there's no whole number in between 1 and 2.
	
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,891
	Threads: 253
	Joined: Jan 02, 2005
	
		
	
 
	
	
		way to completely miss the point, guy.
The point was that I IMPLIED the "equal or greater than". fucking, shit, I now know why nobody wants to teach Special Education. These retards are fucking stupid.
	
	
	
/sarcasm
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 65
	Threads: 6
	Joined: Sep 06, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:there is a third one that is half of the good one for if you kill less than two little sisters but more than one...
You didn't say equal here. This is you're initial paragraph that fucked your self up from the beginning. How the fuck do you have a whole number in between 1 and 2?
	
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,891
	Threads: 253
	Joined: Jan 02, 2005
	
		
	
 
	
	
		OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:way to completely miss the point, guy.
The point was that I IMPLIED the "equal or greater than". fucking, shit, I now know why nobody wants to teach Special Education. These retards are fucking stupid.
OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:The point was that I IMPLIED the "equal or greater than". fucking, shit, I now know why nobody wants to teach Special Education. These retards are fucking stupid.
OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:The point was that I IMPLIED the "equal or greater than". fucking, shit,
OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:I FUCKING IMPLIED the GOD DAMN"equal to or greater than"
![[Image: impliedfd9.jpg]](http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/9228/impliedfd9.jpg) 
	 
	
	
/sarcasm
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 65
	Threads: 6
	Joined: Sep 06, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		So you're saying that your first post is totally irrelevant? Then why'd you post it then? That's where this whole argument came from, that post. That crap post that is very retarded, and it states that you harvest a 1.X number of little sisters.
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,891
	Threads: 253
	Joined: Jan 02, 2005
	
		
	
 
	
	
		No, you fucking douchebag, the first post was implying that you had half a brain cell to comprehend implications in your first fucking language.
Jeesus christ, It EQUAL OR LESS than two and EQUAL OR GREATER than one... for fucks sake, guy.
	
	
	
/sarcasm
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 65
	Threads: 6
	Joined: Sep 06, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:there is a third one that is half of the good one for if you kill less than two little sisters but more than one...
This is what you said. No equal. See? So how can I be the douchebag when it's this very post that makes no sense if you mean that equal to one? Since you clearly said "But more than one" clearly stating that it has to be more than one but less than 2. Since if there's a but, it states a condition, and the condition is that it has to be more than one, making it impossible to equal one. Also, less than two doesnt state or equal to, saying that it's less than 2 and less than 2 only.
	
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,891
	Threads: 253
	Joined: Jan 02, 2005
	
		
	
 
	
	
		Bunnyscreed Wrote:OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:there is a third one that is half of the good one for if you kill less than two little sisters but more than one...
This is what you said. No equal. See? So how can I be the douchebag when it's this very post that makes no sense if you mean that equal to one? Since you clearly said "But more than one" clearly stating that it has to be more than one but less than 2. Since if there's a but, it states a condition, and the condition is that it has to be more than one, making it impossible to equal one. Also, less than two doesnt state or equal to, saying that it's less than 2 and less than 2 only.
One entry found.
Main Entry:
    im·ply 
Pronunciation:
    \im-ˈplī\ 
Function:
    transitive verb 
Inflected Form(s):
    im·plied; im·ply·ing
Etymology:
    Middle English emplien, from Anglo-French emplier to entangle — more at employ
Date:
    14th century
1obsolete : enfold , entwine2: to involve or indicate by inference, association, or necessary consequence rather than by direct statement <rights>3: to contain potentially4: to express indirectly <his>
synonyms see suggest
usage see infer
The equal you were looking for was fucking 
![[Image: impliedfd9.jpg]](http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/9228/impliedfd9.jpg) 
Of course it doesn't state it you dolt. that is why it is
![[Image: impliedfd9.jpg]](http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/9228/impliedfd9.jpg) 
if I stated it than it wouldn't be
![[Image: impliedfd9.jpg]](http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/9228/impliedfd9.jpg) 
and since it was
![[Image: impliedfd9.jpg]](http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/9228/impliedfd9.jpg) 
than I didn't state it!!! HENCE
![[Image: impliedfd9.jpg]](http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/9228/impliedfd9.jpg) 
	 
	
	
/sarcasm
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 65
	Threads: 6
	Joined: Sep 06, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		Just admit it, your first post makes no sense. Period.
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,891
	Threads: 253
	Joined: Jan 02, 2005
	
		
	
 
	
	
		It makes perfect since if you aren't a mooncalvic troglodyte spawned by and with the spooge and egg of two other mooncalvic troglodytes.
If you can't get that one single grammatical device than you should kill yourself or quit speaking English.
	
	
	
/sarcasm