[Rostov]

The third ending(harvest 2 sisters or less only i think) is just like the 'good' ending except the narrator's tone is a little harsher.

[innovacious]

I have yet to see the bad ending. I doubt im ever gonna play bioshock again and im not really interested enough to go find it on youtube, im just wondering is it longer than the good ending? To me it just seemed like as soon as fontaine died i was back at the main menu.

I didnt really enjoy the game that much in the first place and to be rewarded with some crappy 30 second ending was like a slap in the face.

[OmegaZero_Alpha]

Alpha, that's not possible. When you first encounter a little sister you're supposed to harvest/ rescue, you have to do either one, or you won't be able to go through.

WHAT?!?!?!

How is anything I said impossible because of this?

You rescue that one, and then harvest two later...

Jesus Christ, if this is really that hard I should write a gamefaqs walkthrough for it...

[Bunnyscreed]

there is a third one that is half of the good one for if you kill less than two little sisters but more than one...

See, that's impossible. Just admit it, you hate admitting you're wrong. Either that or you're grammar sucks ass.

[OmegaZero_Alpha]

you just suck at life.

Mathematically, if you have a value between one and two, but can only select integers than guess what the options are?

[Bunnyscreed]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer

Read that. No decimals or fractions.

[OmegaZero_Alpha]

HOLY SHIT! Hes 1/2 of the way to getting my point. Lets see if he can drag this one far enough to get it...

Now that you are on to Kindergarten-grade math, lets give you another hint.

the correct answer is one number of a set of two integers that are equal or greater to one, or equal or lesser than two. Either one is correct. GO!

[Bunnyscreed]

HOLY SHIT! Hes 1/2 of the way to getting my point. Lets see if he can drag this one far enough to get it...

Now that you are on to Kindergarten-grade math, lets give you another hint.

the correct answer is one number of a set of two integers that are equal or greater to one, or equal or lesser than two. Either one is correct. GO!

Exactly my point, you can't have an integer that's a decimal or a fraction, more than one and less than 2, which can only be a decimal or fraction.

[Bunnyscreed]

HOLY SHIT! Hes 1/2 of the way to getting my point. Lets see if he can drag this one far enough to get it...

Now that you are on to Kindergarten-grade math, lets give you another hint.

the correct answer is one number of a set of two integers that are equal or greater to one, or equal or lesser than two. Either one is correct. GO!

Exactly my point, you can't have an integer that's a decimal or a fraction, more than one and less than 2, which can only be a decimal or fraction. Unless of course, you meant in your original post "Equal to or less than 2, or equal to or more than one.

there is a third one that is half of the good one for if you kill less than two little sisters but more than one...

You said BUT more than one, meaning it's in the middle.

[OmegaZero_Alpha]

okay, I see what you did. You took everything too literally like a douche.

Usually when you are defining values there is an implied "equal to or less than", like if you are buying a video card and want to spend between 200 and 300$, that doesn't mean you can't spend EXACTLY 200$ or 300$.

So in terms you can understand:

We should end this conversation taking place at SourceOP.com, located http://www.sourceop.com/modules.php?name...ost&p=9309 , Because of the fact that the reason it started (a douchebag, Bunnyscreed, was over-translating everything and trying to define natural numbers as a paradox because he has little or no understanding of the English language of any dialect.) is irrelevant to the set topic and therefore any further arguing of said douchebaggery will be classified as spam and I will be pissed off at said douchebag (bunnyscreed). This is the end of the paragragh.

Simple enough for you?