Posts: 199
	Threads: 10
	Joined: Dec 05, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		Drunken_F00l Wrote:insomniaprincess Wrote:Or turbine, fastlane or granary
 
I'll add them when I add map veto (today maybe  :o ).
Damnit I hate turbine, fastlane, and (sometimes) granary.
	
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 63
	Threads: 1
	Joined: Feb 24, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		Love granary 
 
and Fastlane is pretty good... and turbine is prbly the better of the ctf maps
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 199
	Threads: 10
	Joined: Dec 05, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		I used to love turbine and fastlane but I've gotten sick of them over the past weeks for some reason.
And this poll voted yes to remove 2fort, so it has to be done.  I am sure the 25 people that voted is a true representation of the entirety the valve maps server and you should do what the players want :crossesarms:
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,891
	Threads: 253
	Joined: Jan 02, 2005
	
		
	
 
	
	
		I think it is really too close to have it removed, as DF was biased against it in the first place so it would take a lot more than 13 people to remove it.
	
	
	
/sarcasm
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 579
	Threads: 16
	Joined: Dec 06, 2007
	
		
	
 
	
	
		OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:Hell-met Wrote:Your fact is wrong. 
Valve maps aren't 100% 2fort and cannot be considered as a third 24/7 server.
Nobody said it was a third 24/7 server. I just stated that it was a third server running 2fort.
Quit making up what you are reading as you go along and you won't make these mistakes.
Technically and grammatically he is correct. When referring to the single server Valve maps [#1] he wouldn't use aren't. (sorry, I probably shouldn't even bring this up)
Yes to 2fort! Even if it is one big 43 sniper stalemate demospam fest.  8)
	
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,891
	Threads: 253
	Joined: Jan 02, 2005
	
		
	
 
	
	
		it still sounds stupid as shit.
	
	
	
/sarcasm
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 199
	Threads: 10
	Joined: Dec 05, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		I was joking about the 25 people determining the fate of the server.  But almost every time I've been playing, most bitch about 2fort when it doesn't get voted down for whatever reason... and half just up and leave.  I usually use it as practice time for sniping but, now I've just been going to goldrush or valve#2.  
I do still think it is a valid argument to make that since sourceop already has two servers devoted to 2fort that we could take it off the rotation completely.
I know a lot of people go to these servers to play all the original maps, but I think if they understood there were two other servers devoted to that one map, they will understand if it is taken out of rotation.  So have the front page say they can go and play 2fort at any point if they are in the mood.
And many times I don't even notice the voting thing, so it can be flawed.
I would just move to the #2 server and quit my annoying bitching, but they have like 2 good players total on that server and I enjoy the competition on #1.
Quote:Yes to 2fort! Even if it is one big 43 sniper stalemate demospam fest
No.
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,310
	Threads: 64
	Joined: Feb 15, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		You are playing 2fort wrong if you actively seek to steal the enemy's intel.
Get on ventrilo/teamspeak and start laughing your ass off while making up massive melee brawls in the sewers with friends.
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 804
	Threads: 24
	Joined: Aug 17, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		Isuxdix Wrote:I would just move to the #2 server and quit my annoying bitching, but they have like 2 good players total on that server and I enjoy the competition on #1.
This is an exaggeration. There are good players over there (certainly more than 2), just depends on what time you're playing. 
During the middle of the day when few regulars are on, it's like a noob fest. Certain times of day on weekdays, #1 can be just as bad.
	
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 365
	Threads: 16
	Joined: Dec 17, 2008
	
		
	
 
	
	
		no, its screw around half hour. AXXXXEEEEEE