Rostov Wrote:Wait, religious people can't follow scientific theory? You mean like(among others) Albert Einstein??(Jewish) Wow, who would have thought religion and science were mutually exclusive. C'mon, dig a little deeper.
I'm certainly glad I said 100% of religious people throughout time were stupid. Except I didn't.
Nowhere did I say there weren't smart, open minded or free-thinking religious folks. Nor did I say Agnostics (or other non-denominational religious folks,) which Einstein most properly falls into, were incapable of being smart. Nor did I say Germans born in the 1800's that were born Jewish, learned Catholicism in puberty and later in life practiced neither but still believed in something were incapable of being intelligent (Einstein and Religion: Physics and Theology is an amazing read btw). I spoke specifically of modern-day Americans, who are, in the majority, Christian.
Breaking down the numbers into that 40%/38% mix, those that don't believe evolution are possible cannot accept scientific theory, yes. That 38% can accept it, but have to attribute religion in some way to it (e.g. God guides evolution).
As I said earlier, you can be pleasantly surprised when your assumption is wrong. 20% is a non-trivial amount of the population of the US, and/or of it's Christian people. I chose to be pleasantly surprised by that population; you may chose to hope they are the majority and get disappointed when things like this happen:
http://ncse.com/news/2011/02/antievoluti...ico-006469
And to go back to my original point about major religion needing to evolve, a quote from a non-American, non-Christian, born some 132 years ago, who was religious in an Agnostic sense, and who was a very smart man:
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."