Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Pyro fire in water is an exploit?
#21

Adder Wrote:
Hell-met Wrote:more like bb is more common you twit

No it isn't.

yes it is

i rarely see w+m1ers with normal flamer anymore

[Image: hell-met.jpg]
Reply
#22

lol i've been called a twit three time today
the other two were friends of mine
what's with that word?
Reply
#23

Apparently people think it describes you well.
Reply
#24

Thats one nice thing I dont really give a flying fuck what other people think about me 8) People take the web 2 seriously.Unless some1 really needs a flame to let them know how much of a prick they are I dont bother Idea

[Image: 453b9ec42fd27_13029n.jpg]
Some people are only alive because its illegal to shoot them...
Reply
#25

Emoticons are substitution for punctuation :!:
Reply
#26

lol but it's the word twit
like
what
Reply
#27

Hell-met Wrote:more like any pyro with bb should be slapped

Agreed.

Once I found out you can extinguish people with it I never looked back.

On top of reflecting rockets/nades and juggling uber BB makes little sense.
Reply
#28

unknown Wrote:lol but it's the word twit
like
what
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSqkdcT25ss
Reply
#29

My personal opinion is Ban the bastards if they continually do it. I understand people jump in W+M1 style and you take damage but the flame thrower is not intended to work under water and jumping in the water to circumvent the hit box and make it think you are on dry land is and always will be in my opinion an exploit. Especially with the intended target is fully submerged. This isn't the admins fault its Valves.
Reply
#30

Valve taking no action to fix it may indicate that Valve thinks it's working as intended, which is one reason I don't ban people for it. This bug/exploit/intended behavior has been around for a really long time. Most exploits get patched in one or two patches after being discovered.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)