Posts: 565
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 27, 2009
yea i think thats the exact thing I need to use them for too. I'm fairly quick using the disguise kit (and even use friendly team disguises consistently) but its still time consuming. Think I'll set that up later tonight.
Posts: 940
Threads: 24
Joined: Dec 12, 2008
OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:/mu/ isn't far off from /v/ and /b/ last time I was there, but I know that if you /thread yourself in /ck/ like one of those inbred Neanderthals from the European islands they will have your ass.
i use /ck/ to get recipes, not to discuss things
/mu/ is only good for sharing threads, discussion is pointless because of the insane amount of self-abasement. though, it should be noted, that's true for every single board, hence why i try to stay away from 4chan unless i need to cook something or need to find new music.
Posts: 4,891
Threads: 253
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
unknown Wrote:i use /ck/ to get recipes, not to discuss things
/mu/ is only good for sharing threads, discussion is pointless because of the insane amount of self-abasement. though, it should be noted, that's true for every single board, hence why i try to stay away from 4chan unless i need to cook something or need to find new music.
I find /g/ good for discussion. I haven't fucked up a computer since I started going there.
Although you are going to end up with a stupid fucking ricer machine with useless AMD and ATI shit crammed in it if you don't know how to spot a troll.
/sarcasm
Posts: 560
Threads: 11
Joined: Sep 30, 2008
Nothing wrong with AMD
Posts: 4,891
Threads: 253
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
jwstohr Wrote:Nothing wrong with AMD :(
if they could build a quad-core properly
/sarcasm
Posts: 565
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 27, 2009
I find amd&intel are just in constant power struggle back and forth same goes for ati&nvidia. It's all dependent on the usage and the current developments at the companies to which I decide to purchase at the time.
Posts: 4,891
Threads: 253
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Matrox and Nvidia were in a power struggle. That didn't stop Matrox from becoming 100% obsolete and fan boys still followed them until they receded into the 'professional' market, where Nvidia proceeded to continue stomping upon Matrox's face with their Quadro series.
/sarcasm
Posts: 565
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 27, 2009
Yep last I researched whne I built my latest computer intel was distinctly ahead of amd as well as nvidia being ahead of ati. That was mostly due to the ati-amd merger and their ensuing work on a combined cpu/gpu chip taking precedence at the time. Now though with Intel becoming frightened by Nvidia's potential in using their gpus in place of intel's cpus, they've begun fighting with one another and their product lines may begin to suffer from it.
Posts: 4,891
Threads: 253
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Ranma Wrote:Nvidia's potential in using their gpus in place of intel's cpus, they've begun fighting with one another and their product lines may begin to suffer from it.
Cuda has been hurting Nvidia's gaming, though. ATI's cards almost looked decent this time because of it.
Their ability to run PhysX tipped it for me, though. I like cool shit like that.
As for the competition between Cuda and Intel, Why in the fuck? They both have way in the fuck too much power for the consumer-end AND the enthusiast market in far of processing power, I don't see why they are continuing to increase in power.
/sarcasm