Posts: 480
Threads: 15
Joined: Apr 27, 2008
oh and also because we have admins that abuse their powers. such as Hell-met
I am Half-Duplex`, and I approve this message.
Posts: 4,310
Threads: 64
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
Posts: 4,939
Threads: 117
Joined: May 11, 2008
I hate it when my boyfriends fight; Stop it right now!
(i dont liek autoscramble)
Thanks.
Posts: 4,891
Threads: 253
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Gold rush members?
Against auto-scramble?
Who would have thought?
/sarcasm
Posts: 51
Threads: 3
Joined: May 31, 2009
Auto-scramble makes it tougher to work together as a team and generally decreases cooperation. Usually, when your team is losing, its because you have the wrong groupings of classes, or because there was something wrong with the strategy. If the team gets rolled through once, it allows for the wake-up call to the team, and the more experienced players can tell the rest what they may see as the problem. Before, people didn't always switch classes or strategy accordingly, but many times they did. Now with auto-scramble, there is never this adjustment that takes place, since the senior members know they would be wasting their breath, since who knows what the team will look like next round, and the bonehead who was the 6th spy on the team gets switched to the team with one other spy. Now that bonehead wins, and even if the senior members were saying "too many spies" the bonehead blames the past team failure of just being a bad team, rather than learning the lesson by getting rolled a few times. Now that bonehead will never get the picture and always blame his team.
I've been on teams that thought the other team was so stacked, they gave up and waited for auto-scramble, rather than trying to rally together and work as a team, we had 8 spies that round. The other team is stacked, if your team gives up before the match.
I'm sure some people will read this and be like "stacker." If by stacker, you mean I'm someone who prefers to play with cooperative, experienced, players who I know, than I sure. I'm a stacker.
Posts: 4,891
Threads: 253
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Takara Wrote:I'm sure some people will read this and be like "stacker." If by stacker, you mean I'm someone who prefers to play with cooperative, experienced, players who I know, than I sure. I'm a stacker.
All of the cooperative, experience players join the winning team. So yes, you probably are a stacker.
/sarcasm
Posts: 1,837
Threads: 9
Joined: Oct 04, 2008
autoscramble is sort of a lose-lose situation, but it beats the alternative of getting slaughtered over and over again by stacked teams, whether the stack is real or imagined.
Posts: 51
Threads: 3
Joined: May 31, 2009
Takara Wrote:Auto-scramble makes it tougher to work together as a team and generally decreases cooperation. Usually, when your team is losing, its because you have the wrong groupings of classes, or because there was something wrong with the strategy. If the team gets rolled through once, it allows for the wake-up call to the team, and the more experienced players can tell the rest what they may see as the problem. Before, people didn't always switch classes or strategy accordingly, but many times they did. Now with auto-scramble, there is never this adjustment that takes place, since the senior members know they would be wasting their breath, since who knows what the team will look like next round, and the bonehead who was the 6th spy on the team gets switched to the team with one other spy. Now that bonehead wins, and even if the senior members were saying "too many spies" the bonehead blames the past team failure of just being a bad team, rather than learning the lesson by getting rolled a few times. Now that bonehead will never get the picture and always blame his team.
I've been on teams that thought the other team was so stacked, they gave up and waited for auto-scramble, rather than trying to rally together and work as a team, we had 8 spies that round. The other team is stacked, if your team gives up before the match.
The above is the support for the statement you quoted.
OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:Takara Wrote:I'm sure some people will read this and be like "stacker." If by stacker, you mean I'm someone who prefers to play with cooperative, experienced, players who I know, than I sure. I'm a stacker.
All of the cooperative, experience players join the winning team. So yes, you probably are a stacker.
My point is that auto-scramble creates uncooperative players.
Playing Team Fortress with players who don't care to play as a team, and will never learn how to.
Cooperation creates an environment for more players to gain experience.
EVERYONE prefers to play with experienced players.
Posts: 51
Threads: 3
Joined: May 31, 2009
glouch Wrote:autoscramble is sort of a lose-lose situation, but it beats the alternative of getting slaughtered over and over again by stacked teams, whether the stack is real or imagined.
So you say auto-scramble sucks all the time.
and
Stacked teams happen only some of the time, and when they do, the map changes quick. Then the teams are scrambled. Auto-scramble, scrambles teams that are competitive and close, turning the team uncompetitive, unorganized and uncooperative.
I'd like the win some lose some situation over the lose-lose.
Posts: 4,939
Threads: 117
Joined: May 11, 2008
@takara: that's what I was thinking.
Thanks.