Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws

[OmegaZero_Alpha]

OH, yeah. Valve hasn't released blatantly unfinished or untested items publicly just drastically change them later.

You are totally right.

It's a shame intent and reality are two different things, huh? And the blinders have to be on pretty restrictive to apply that to Natasha and not open windows. But hey, anything goes in the name of semantic victories, I guess.

You have it backwards. Applying it to Natasha and the windows is textbook grasping at straws.

[jerclay]

Ah yes, the "I know you are but what am I" rebuttal. Play that game without defending your stance all you want, the bottom line is you chose the absolute. Absolutes, such as unintended = exploit, cannot be attacked with exaggerations, distortions or as you've called it, "grasping at straws." They all rely on making a lot out of a little, but still require that "little." Something that doesn't exist if it's absolute.

But we know it isn't absolute, hence why you've resorted to the "I know you are but what am I" rebuttal. So can I assume your next reply is going to be about the semantics and not the reconciliation of things that are neither unintended nor an exploit? More witty little translations of my posts without defending your stance, perhaps?

[Hell-met]

[Snarf]

Ah yes, the "I know you are but what am I" rebuttal. Play that game without defending your stance all you want, the bottom line is you chose the absolute. Absolutes, such as unintended = exploit, cannot be attacked with exaggerations, distortions or as you've called it, "grasping at straws." They all rely on making a lot out of a little, but still require that "little." Something that doesn't exist if it's absolute.

But we know it isn't absolute, hence why you've resorted to the "I know you are but what am I" rebuttal. So can I assume your next reply is going to be about the semantics and not the reconciliation of things that are neither unintended nor an exploit? More witty little translations of my posts without defending your stance, perhaps?

[OmegaZero_Alpha]

Ah yes, the "I know you are but what am I" rebuttal. Play that game without defending your stance all you want, the bottom line is you chose the absolute. Absolutes, such as unintended = exploit, cannot be attacked with exaggerations, distortions or as you've called it, "grasping at straws." They all rely on making a lot out of a little, but still require that "little." Something that doesn't exist if it's absolute.

But we know it isn't absolute, hence why you've resorted to the "I know you are but what am I" rebuttal. So can I assume your next reply is going to be about the semantics and not the reconciliation of things that are neither unintended nor an exploit? More witty little translations of my posts without defending your stance, perhaps?

This picture about sums up this thread...



also, > implying 'blinders' and 'grasping at straws' are even near similar

I mean your entire argument with me is trying to say that using a weapon featured by the developer and firing through an overlooked architectural flaw are the same thing.

[jerclay]

So can I assume your next reply is going to be about the semantics and not the reconciliation of things that are neither unintended nor an exploit?

Well, I got the biggest prediction right.

And honestly, if you thought I was trying to imply a similarity between stating you have blinders on, and grasping at straws, then I just don't think you understand the issue at all. I'd be interested in seeing the logic path of that conclusion.

[WombRaider]

when oza starts name calling and posting pictures he found on 4chan, it's safe to say that he's got fucking nothing to bring to the table.

which is funny since that's what he does all the time.

ignore him.

[raptor777777]

the map is created by Valve.

Whatever you can do in this map is (partially) intended by Valve.

If you do NOT want people to do certain things, download source SDK, go to hammer, make a block with CLIP and place it over these holes, then change the map to ctf_2fort_noholesonplacesthatannoyme instarespawn and all problems are solved!

Also, I dont see the problem,
This is just like building sentry when attacking dustbowl or shooting through the holes in cp_well.

I really don't see the problem, it's just like: "SOmebody builds sentries at the cp, thats not intended".

If you REALLY want to change this, report bug is the solution

[glouch]

If you REALLY want to change this, report bug is the solution

have you ever even tried this?

[raptor777777]

If you REALLY want to change this, report bug is the solution

have you ever even tried this?

yes, I reported: Ludicrous Lid doesn't make the correct sound when doing equalizer taunt, next day: HALLELUJAH!