Moderator
Steam:
76561197976694383 Steam join date: Jan 1, 1970
Steam Level: -1
Profile Status:
Private
Originally Posted by
OmegaZero_Alpha
I didn't feel I needed to read the full thread because I actually PLAY on 2fort and I actually understand the issue, and I agree that the subject is debatable. If you had read MY post you would have noted that in any debate the person who has the end-all authority as to the matter is the server administration. As son as they make their decision the matter is as good as closed and your opinion is invalid.
So when hell-met decides to say that rocket jumping onto a light or something like that is an exploit we should just accept our bans because he's an admin and knows best?
As has been proven many, many times: the administration can be WRONG.
Calling this an exploit doesn't mean it actually is one.
It may be fucking stupid to sit there all map and do this, but it's certainly a viable strategy.
The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State.
Reply With Quote