Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Intelligence says: Xbox 360 can GTFO

  1. #1
    OmegaZero_Alpha's Avatar



    Join Date
    Jan 02, 2005
    Last Online
    Jul 16, 2019
    Posts
    4,880
    Threads
    253
    Reputation
    SourceOP Thread


        
    Steam: 76561197979925166 
    Steam join date: Dec 24, 2005
    Steam Level: 44
    Profile Status: Public


    Intelligence says: Xbox 360 can GTFO


    Playstation 3 is the winner of the console wars this gen, folks. and i have a pile of intelligent reasons why:

    First off, its the 360 in the first place. Who in the hell wants to buy a system that has, what they call it, "select backwards compatibility". come on, how hard is it to make a system that cant play all of the games that it should. i know you could barely do it the first time, but sequils should improve.

    Second point goes to the PS3 for: GRAPHICS. i dont know if youve noticed, but all of the PS3's actuall hardware-rendered footage is looking better than the 360's pre-rendering. that is called PWNAGE.

    Third time: PRICING. this may have cought your attention before, but your investment is safer with the PS3. with the 360 you have to pay a good 50$ a year for full online play. PS3 is 1224124124x cheaper, thats because its free. and not only is it free, but it gives you free internet and connectivity with your PSP (if you have one). SO even if you get the PS3 at $600 the difference should pay for itself in a couple of years, and then some.

    OOPS, heres four: Games. Sony has better games than Xbox 360. Xbox is bragging about ES:Oblivion, Halo3 and Fable, so lets kick em in the nuts with Sony's master list of EXCLUSIVE game franchises:

    Metal Gear Solid
    Kingdom Hearts
    God OF War
    Gran Turismo, tourist trophy
    Twisted Metal
    Jak and Daxter
    Ratchet and Clank
    Tekken
    Black
    Killzone
    LEMMINGS
    Assasins creed
    AND MUCH MUCH MORE!!!

    FIVE FOR YOU: Hardware capabilities:Hey listen, PS3 twice as fast, more hard-drive space and 4 more controllers, that arent only existing, but they are bluetooth instead of old-ass radio frequencies. radio < bluetooth.

    OMG ITS T3h SIX: and if all of that wasnt enough sony has a vastly deeper development base.

    seven just for the hell of it: it has WAAAAY more media types that it supports. not only blu-ray but compact-flash that is poweres by magicgate (the leaders in compact flash).

    Shove that in the console-wargun and blow it through your skull which wasnt smart enough to realize that you shouldnt buy a console just because its the first one out...

  2. #2
    MagneticLlama's Avatar



    Join Date
    Feb 13, 2006
    Last Online
    Feb 02, 2007
    Posts
    27
    Threads
    0




    Actually, Nintendo totally dominated E3. Nice try though.

  3. #3
    Naquadria's Avatar



    Join Date
    Dec 11, 2004
    Last Online
    Mar 07, 2012
    Posts
    697
    Threads
    30




    Yeah its' true Nintendo was the star of the E3 Show. Sony was a big let down this year. =/

  4. #4
    pandragon_exile's Avatar



    Join Date
    Apr 03, 2006
    Last Online
    Sep 01, 2007
    Posts
    156
    Threads
    6




    ah this whole thing is biased but I admit that PS3 is better because I'm a PS fan

  5. #5
    OmegaZero_Alpha's Avatar



    Join Date
    Jan 02, 2005
    Last Online
    Jul 16, 2019
    Posts
    4,880
    Threads
    253
    Reputation
    SourceOP Thread


        
    Steam: 76561197979925166 
    Steam join date: Dec 24, 2005
    Steam Level: 44
    Profile Status: Public



    nitendo dint exactly dominate the entire show, each company dominated in its own way:

    Microsoft dominated via brainwashed stupid people
    Sony dominated in graphics and hardware
    Nintendo dominated with innovation (and they made a gamepad that actually gives older games replay value, although instead of making adapters to play old cartrage games they should sell the ROM files of them over an internet based market... but hay.)

    OH, and i got an email based on this post, it read:

    HAHA, you stupid fanboy all the sony playstation is is Plagurize system 3, they stole the rumble they stole the motion sensor and they stole spider man font. get a clue.

    so whoever was nice enough to send me that (im not posting his email) i have this to say:

    Microsoft stole the "rumble" too
    Microsoft stole the motion sensory with their "innovative" Xwand
    and anybody with half a brain cell can tell that those fonts are different

    microsoft is even less origional in all of those cases by not only taking the ideas but taking them dead freaking last.

  6. #6
    Naquadria's Avatar



    Join Date
    Dec 11, 2004
    Last Online
    Mar 07, 2012
    Posts
    697
    Threads
    30




    Sony dominated in boredom. I tried so hard to watch their press conference but it was so hard not to fall asleep from it. X-Box to me looked better then the PS3. So I dunno i feel sony was kind of a let down, not to mention the PS3 is going to be the most expensive system, but I guess we'll see cause i'm still a PS fan. Nintendo might have the weakest system in the terms of visuals but I think it makes up for all that by making the game more interactive then ever before. So yeah, Nintendo gets my vote for best system this time around. I may be a Nintendo fan but I'm not completely bias.


    So this will now be my 5th nintendo system if I can find enough money to get it.

  7. #7
    larz's Avatar



    Join Date
    Jan 26, 2006
    Last Online
    Feb 19, 2013
    Posts
    1,460
    Threads
    125




    who the F**k is gonna pay $600 dollars for the Ps3....Im not a big nintendeo fan but i hav 2 say they are pretty smart on keepin things cheap and the new controller and the downloadable games make the Revolution(it will always b the revolution to me)a sure console war winner in my eyes..(though i admit that the Ps3 is by far the most advanced and powerful console of all this gen.)

  8. #8
    pandragon_exile's Avatar



    Join Date
    Apr 03, 2006
    Last Online
    Sep 01, 2007
    Posts
    156
    Threads
    6




    there's a thing called "credit card". you can use it to pay $600 over the course of several months and there will be a lot of people paying $600 for PS3. (but I rahter buy another opteron or xeon chip with $600 )

  9. #9
    larz's Avatar



    Join Date
    Jan 26, 2006
    Last Online
    Feb 19, 2013
    Posts
    1,460
    Threads
    125




    u do not use credit cards 2 buy stuff unless u need it. credit card companies like ppl like u pandragon. ppl like u are how credit companies make ther money........they luv ppl that spend money they dont really hav on credit so that they cant pay interest at the end of the month then the credit card cos raise the interest rate ........to wher in reality becuz of cred cards many americans are paying 2-3 times the normal price for things becuz of outragueos interest rates.......NEVER EVER BUY UNEEDED THINGS ON CREDIT.....CREDIT CARDS STEAL UR MONEY!!! unless u can pay them off every month.

  10. #10
    OmegaZero_Alpha's Avatar



    Join Date
    Jan 02, 2005
    Last Online
    Jul 16, 2019
    Posts
    4,880
    Threads
    253
    Reputation
    SourceOP Thread


        
    Steam: 76561197979925166 
    Steam join date: Dec 24, 2005
    Steam Level: 44
    Profile Status: Public



    lars, its only $600... it may sound like alot but when you get into morgages and owning your own house/condo than that is going to be chump change (an average household spends twice that a month). not to mention you make monthly payments on it and its going to be like nothing.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread