[OmegaZero_Alpha]

Alpha, I like how you call me narcissistic, then call me textbook paranoid, make up your mind.

I see you've tried to dismiss my entire post by finding one thing wrong with it and mocking it.

This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because mocking a claim does not show that it is false. In this specific case it's a fallacy because psychologically these things commonly occur in tangent, and you're showing symptoms of both.

You've also failed to prove that cameras and computer taps are actually bad but I'll give you props on repeating the same thing over and over and over again, even though we already knew that it was happening.

Unfortunately I have to inform you that the presence of cameras doesn't prove anything in this context and is beside the point on weather or not they're actually hurting anything for anybody other than the paranoid.

Can you please start trying to argue within the means of acceptable logic?