[Hell-met]

I was wondering how long until you'd stop defending the reasoning you gave after it was shown flawed, and just resort to belitting the idea in general. Four pages. It's easy to predict if (that was the first reply), the hard part is predicting when.

I can't resist laughing at some stubborn twit making youtube videos on a expired ban matter.

Get over yourself.

On a side-note, you haven't shown my idea as flawed anywhere else other than in your imaginary world.

So when hell-met decides to say that rocket jumping onto a light or something like that is an exploit we should just accept our bans because he's an admin and knows best?

except it won't happen.

if you're on a tiny ledge or prop somewhere in the battlefield or enemy base, you're vulnerable as shit.

And just because the administration has been wrong doesn't mean that we don't have to listen to what they say.

being wrong is subjective.

You can kill opposing snipers without ever getting yourself killed with the scottishresistance by shooting inside a cosmetic prop. This is an exploit in my book.