Aug 14, 2010, 01:25 AM
I never look at history of a player. New player can be a very good gamer and just picked up TF2. Old account can pick up any day a hack if they want. Unless you found his IP address and match it with a known aimbotter (ie: circumventing a ban) its no consideration into it. Such comments are meant to just making somebody suspicious, its no proof of it. As for not setting up the profile, there are enough ppl around who simply DONT CARE about such.
"unrealistic" shots do not define a aimbot. He does miss, he does hit elsewhere than the head, etc. Yes, having the wallhack will probably mean that he has a aimbot too. But really... with a aimbot one does not really need a wallhack.
I only recently started to play sniper with rifle, played only with bow before. I'm now a decent sniper, and was already one after bout 20 hours of play as sniper. After having made all the vids above and seen them dozens of times I had a pretty good clue what would help or not.
I agree a bunch of the shots are suspicious, but one needs to DEFINE it to properly BAN someone for suspicious shots, which are ALSO from SPECTATOR, so there is no lag compensation and shots are "off" due this. Yes, I can make a 100 fps movie with it and measure it all out etc. But that's only adding useless work to something if there is no defined tell-tale.
I do often shots that I know for spectators would look very suspicious, just because I'm a high-sens player (mouse sensitivity high). I picked also the habit up to make demo's of everything I do a long time ago. I just checked, got about 5 GB of demo's in it from early July (last time around I cleaned up) to now.
If you say aimbot, the aimbot must leave a SIGNATURE of what it exactly DOES. Just banning cos someone managed some iffy shots is already done on a lot of servers calling it "aimbot" cos the admins don't want those very good ones on their servers. Or put any effort in "reading" the evidence or gathering any of such by making a demo, screenshots etc, and review those properly.
"unrealistic" shots do not define a aimbot. He does miss, he does hit elsewhere than the head, etc. Yes, having the wallhack will probably mean that he has a aimbot too. But really... with a aimbot one does not really need a wallhack.
I only recently started to play sniper with rifle, played only with bow before. I'm now a decent sniper, and was already one after bout 20 hours of play as sniper. After having made all the vids above and seen them dozens of times I had a pretty good clue what would help or not.
I agree a bunch of the shots are suspicious, but one needs to DEFINE it to properly BAN someone for suspicious shots, which are ALSO from SPECTATOR, so there is no lag compensation and shots are "off" due this. Yes, I can make a 100 fps movie with it and measure it all out etc. But that's only adding useless work to something if there is no defined tell-tale.
I do often shots that I know for spectators would look very suspicious, just because I'm a high-sens player (mouse sensitivity high). I picked also the habit up to make demo's of everything I do a long time ago. I just checked, got about 5 GB of demo's in it from early July (last time around I cleaned up) to now.
If you say aimbot, the aimbot must leave a SIGNATURE of what it exactly DOES. Just banning cos someone managed some iffy shots is already done on a lot of servers calling it "aimbot" cos the admins don't want those very good ones on their servers. Or put any effort in "reading" the evidence or gathering any of such by making a demo, screenshots etc, and review those properly.