[OmegaZero_Alpha]

Whatever you say, grumpy. xD

http://www.destructoid.com/review-duke-n...3658.phtml[/url]]A festering irrelevance with nothing to offer the world. It's a game with an odious personality, one that could only endear itself to the sociopathic and mentally maladjusted. There may be life in Duke yet, but not his current incarnation. Not while his developers legitimately think he's cool and hilarious, rather than creepy and nauseating, and not while he's starring in games that can't even compete with budget titles.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-0...ver-review[/url]]
In the end, you feel every year of Duke Nukem Forever's ridiculous, fractured development seeping out of each unsatisfying frame.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/gam...me-reviewl[/url]]A mark for nostalgia then – it's the Duke, after all – and one for the game. If this was 15 years in the making, it makes you wonder what they did for the other 14 years and 10 months.

http://www.joystiq.com/2011/06/10/duke-n...-king-baby[/url]]What has, at long last, been committed to a disc and placed into a box might have been alright a dozen years ago, but by today's standards it simply doesn't hold up.

ttp://www.dpadmagazine.com/2011/06/12/duke-nukem-forever/[/url]]Duke Nukem Forever is a strange enough novelty all on its own, but when all is said and done, it is a vastly aged shooter that is left trailing in the dust of its modern contemporaries.

http://www.videogamer.com/xbox360/duke_n...eview.html[/url]]As a bizarre curio of video game history, Duke Nukem Forever's appeal cannot be denied, and there is some entertainment derived from overlooking the end product of one of history's most troubled productions. The main thing we can learn looking backwards, however, is that no game should be like this going forward.

OR whatever EVERYBODY says.