May 13, 2012, 09:24 PM
hamie96 Wrote:Conflicting story, on one point, he scammed someone, but on the other side, he was doing it with the intention of helping someone.
My opinion is he should be marked for trading with a scammer. You can't enforce Zero Tolerance on trading with scammers then not pull through with it.
He should be marked for trading with a scammer AND scamming himself. Like others said in the thread - It doesn't matter who you scam, you're the one taking the vigilante justice into your hands and it's not okay.