1999 > 2007 - Printable Version

+- SourceOP (http://forums.sourceop.com)
+-- Forum: Misc. (http://forums.sourceop.com/Misc-forum)
+--- Forum: Flame Bucket (http://forums.sourceop.com/Flame-Bucket-forum)
+--- Thread: 1999 > 2007 (/1999-2007-thread)

---

1999 > 2007 - OmegaZero_Alpha - Feb 25, 2007

i knew it was sarcasm, but i feel obligated to clarify people sarcasm for people who are (a) not-versed in the subject (b) new or © they dont care, but are slightly curious.

thats just a temporary avy until i get the better-looking one made, i was happy at how it turned out, though (minor photoshop ftw)

---

1999 > 2007 - larz - Feb 25, 2007

OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:i knew it was sarcasm, but i feel obligated to clarify people sarcasm for people who are (a) not-versed in the subject (b) new or © they dont care, but are slightly curious.

thats just a temporary avy until i get the better-looking one made, i was happy at how it turned out, though (minor photoshop ftw)

would you mind making me an avatar???
something using this symbol????

---

1999 > 2007 - Retribution - Feb 26, 2007

alright blu-ray was always the best chose, it the product of a masive leap forward in storing data on a standard CD with great results, while HDDVD is just finding ways to put more on the say CD with the same old metods( for the record, HDDVD is a resent deveoplment, while blu-ray was fisrt made 10+ years ago, they just kept it off the market while they milked all they could from the old stuff, this is the way of our econemy,
and i hope one day i'll be given the abbility to change this
)

---

1999 > 2007 - OmegaZero_Alpha - Feb 26, 2007



click the pic for a rar, larz


and i think they were withholding blu-ray so that they could refine technology, because just up until a year ago they could only get about .02x blu-ray drives, now they are at 2x

---

1999 > 2007 - larz - Feb 26, 2007

OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:

click the pic for a rar, larz


and i think they were withholding blu-ray so that they could refine technology, because just up until a year ago they could only get about .02x blu-ray drives, now they are at 2x

thanx a million midian woot!!!

---

1999 > 2007 - OmegaZero_Alpha - Aug 28, 2008

I thought I would come back here and confirm that Blu-Ray was, in fact, for the win.

---

1999 > 2007 - -LMA- - Aug 29, 2008

I will agreed on the 360.

I like it a little better myself personally than the PS3 but after you get all the shit you need for it, it's still more expensive due to if you want online play.


Let's have a look:


Xbox 360 20GB model - $300
Xbox wireless adapter (since it doesn't come with wi-fi already like the Wii and PS3 - $95
Xbox live - $50 per year

Total $445



PS3 40GB model - $400
Wi-fi adapter already installed
Free online play

Total- $400 plus a 20GB bigger HD

---

1999 > 2007 - Retribution - Aug 30, 2008

but you can't pirate blu-ray worth shit, i already got called out by fox for that, they actualy have a security code in the file and inorder to play it the player need the secutrity code, but they track the secutiry codes when it moves online

---

1999 > 2007 - OmegaZero_Alpha - Aug 30, 2008

yeah, but all of my movies are DIVX anyway... its a high-def movie for 900 megs instead of 25 GIGS

---

1999 > 2007 - larz - Aug 30, 2008

Retribution Wrote:but you can't pirate blu-ray worth shit

thats why it wins


gg...

---