SourceOP
THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM - Printable Version

+- SourceOP (http://forums.sourceop.com)
+-- Forum: Misc. (http://forums.sourceop.com/Misc-forum)
+--- Forum: Flame Bucket (http://forums.sourceop.com/Flame-Bucket-forum)
+--- Thread: THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM (/THIS-ENTIRE-SECTION-OF-THE-FORUM-thread)

Pages: 1 2

THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM - reaper0268wtf - Mar 23, 2012

dronefly Wrote:Hopefully these little kids won't eat too much glue and poison themselves. I am hesitant to call child services on this forum for neglecting little children and leaving them unattended.
FLAME ON BIATCHES!

That is funny but I dont eat the glue anymore... not since Dopp taught me to sniff it

THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM - serialjoe - Mar 24, 2012

dude u totally gotta line it up like of 8ball and sniff it hard, when ur nose is oozing with the stuff u know uve done well Tongue, my uncle jimmy was a glue huffer and i come from a long line of sand eaters :o

THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM - dronefly - Mar 26, 2012

serialjoe Wrote:dude u totally gotta line it up like of 8ball and sniff it hard, when ur nose is oozing with the stuff u know uve done well Tongue, my uncle jimmy was a glue huffer and i come from a long line of sand eaters :o

ahh.. we have a young padwan here. Tongue

THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM - serialjoe - Mar 26, 2012

my point taken, go back under ur rock, and sniff some cockroach droppings, i think u need to huff some more roach before ur tall enought to ride the forum,

THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM - dronefly - Mar 26, 2012

serialjoe Wrote:my point taken, go back under ur rock, and sniff some cockroach droppings, i think u need to huff some more roach before ur tall enought to ride the forum,

I'll bet you a community sparkle lugermorph that: I am older then you, more successful in real life then you and have at least 50-70 IQ points more then you on an official IQ test. Sorry I am NOT better at eating "polish sausages" or "fudge packing" then you. You can keep that title.

THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM - OmegaZero_Alpha - Mar 26, 2012

dronefly Wrote:
serialjoe Wrote:my point taken, go back under ur rock, and sniff some cockroach droppings, i think u need to huff some more roach before ur tall enought to ride the forum,

I'll bet you a community sparkle lugermorph that: I am older then you, more successful in real life then you and have at least 50-70 IQ points more then you on an official IQ test. Sorry I am NOT better at eating "polish sausages" or "fudge packing" then you. You can keep that title.

Please don't tell me you actually think that IQ tests are valid past the developmental stages in children.

THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM - serialjoe - Mar 26, 2012

lol ur comment again is invalid, and makes no sense dronefly and to oza, iq test are valid to test for logical type of intelligence, but theres more than one type of intelligence that exist, and its a limited test, for testing overall intelligence, mostly concentrates on the logical type of intelligence, leaving out other types of intelligence testing in the process

THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM - OmegaZero_Alpha - Mar 26, 2012

serialjoe Wrote:lol ur comment again is invalid, and makes no sense dronefly and to oza, iq test are valid to test for logical type of intelligence, but theres more than one type of intelligence that exist, and its a limited test, for testing overall intelligence, mostly concentrates on the logical type of intelligence, leaving out other types of intelligence testing in the process

In the broadest sense, but the creator of the methodoligy never meant it to be used on adults or even teenagers. Above the age of 9 you start to get severely different scores, varying by as much as 40 points at 12 years of age and 50 points at 18.

This is why more reputible societies discard it as garbage if the test wasn't conducted between the ages of 5 to 8, and for anything older they've adapted their own tests.

THIS ENTIRE SECTION OF THE FORUM - serialjoe - Mar 26, 2012

seems legit, thats why i guess testing it after adolescence , like 18 years old+ would make more sense, to get a more concrete score, and to add, there should be other tests to get scoring on Linguistic and verbal intelligence, Spatial intelligence, Body-Movement Intelligence, Musical Intelligence, Interpersonal intelligence, Intrapersonal intelligence and Naturalist intelligence,

Bottom line is life experience teaches u things u cant always find in books, so a combination of a good upbringing, living life and good school courses, will get u a global view and understanding of the world that surrounds us

and yes i agree the test is limited as u said, and fluctuation in scoring, because testing from different ages yelds different scores,

i think personality testing helps get more about who u are, and also im unaware of other types of tests than the standard iq test, but im shur they
must be something that test all of the above types of intelligence,

that is all.