Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Printable Version
+- SourceOP (http://forums.sourceop.com)
+-- Forum: SourceOP Server (http://forums.sourceop.com/SourceOP-Server-forum)
+--- Forum: Problems/Help (http://forums.sourceop.com/Problems-Help-forum)
+--- Thread: Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws (/Banned-Consistently-exploiting-architectural-flaws-thread)
+- SourceOP (http://forums.sourceop.com)
+-- Forum: SourceOP Server (http://forums.sourceop.com/SourceOP-Server-forum)
+--- Forum: Problems/Help (http://forums.sourceop.com/Problems-Help-forum)
+--- Thread: Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws (/Banned-Consistently-exploiting-architectural-flaws-thread)
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - WombRaider - Oct 03, 2010
OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:Snarf Wrote:You seriously still fucking care?
I have more of a problem with him just repeating the same fallacious bullshit.
which part of his post was fallacious?
why are you such a pretentious douche?
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Butane - Oct 03, 2010
glouch Wrote:he set the timer on his cam for 5 sec so he could quickly cap himself.Snarf Wrote:You seriously still fucking care?uhh snarf where did you find that image? 8O :blurp:
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - jerclay - Oct 04, 2010
OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:Snarf Wrote:You seriously still fucking care?
I have more of a problem with him just repeating the same fallacious bullshit.
Like the part where you stated the other side can't do it, when in fact they can? Or are you not counting that in your "fallacious bullshit" category?
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Half-Duplex - Oct 04, 2010
I have to side with Jerclay here. Design flaw, maybe. Exploit, hardly.
Besides, DF already said he wouldn't ban for an offense such as this. I think Hell-met is wrong in his actions on this matter.
And besides, I know I've seen Hell-met exploit abuse more than once before. Who are we trying to kid here.
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Hell-met - Oct 04, 2010
totally not biaised
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Half-Duplex - Oct 04, 2010
You're right. Totally not biased. I went through the entire thread. And even if you did have it out for him, its a silly reason to kick.
Its nothing like shooting through the gates at start up.
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Hell-met - Oct 04, 2010
Since I've already said everything I had to say in this thread,
deal w/ it nerd
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Half-Duplex - Oct 04, 2010
Not trying to make an attack on you in anyway. But DF did say he wouldn't have banned for something so small to avoid headache such as this.
I know you're trying to "do your job" as admin...
...and I know each admin is different when it comes to what they are willing to tolerate.
But I think next time you should ask yourself WWDFD before hand when it comes to an issue as small as this. Especially if you intend on banning for 10 days...regardless if you fat-fingered it or not :/
it really does sound like you were sniffing for a reason to ban. poor admin skills bro.
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - jerclay - Oct 04, 2010
Didn't you hear? Not agreeing with him is plenty basis for bias accusations.
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - glouch - Oct 04, 2010
guys I just realized something.
2fort.