Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Printable Version
+- SourceOP (http://forums.sourceop.com)
+-- Forum: SourceOP Server (http://forums.sourceop.com/SourceOP-Server-forum)
+--- Forum: Problems/Help (http://forums.sourceop.com/Problems-Help-forum)
+--- Thread: Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws (/Banned-Consistently-exploiting-architectural-flaws-thread)
+- SourceOP (http://forums.sourceop.com)
+-- Forum: SourceOP Server (http://forums.sourceop.com/SourceOP-Server-forum)
+--- Forum: Problems/Help (http://forums.sourceop.com/Problems-Help-forum)
+--- Thread: Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws (/Banned-Consistently-exploiting-architectural-flaws-thread)
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - jerclay - Sep 22, 2010
I'd be more than happy to specify:
"and kicked me for something as benign as something or another about their success in a particular game hinging on rng crits."
benign = harmless
something or another = some miscellaneous statement I made
ie, he kicked me because I made a relatively harmless statement. That statement consisted of me correlating his success in that game being reliant on his crit luck. I can't remember specifics, but I think it went back and forth once or twice, where he stated he can't choose when he gets random crits. I stated (paraphrasing), I know, hence the word "luck."
Very shortly after that, I get disconnected and a message stating "Kicked: (something here, can't remember specifics, but it was clear in that it was a human decision and not server)."
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Hell-met - Sep 22, 2010
when did I ever kick anyone for random crits?
infact, I did not have admin at the time.
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - KockEyedNerd - Sep 22, 2010
I just pray this guy never gets perma banned for anything, because then he'd never shut the hell up and he'll be fighting with everyone on this site for years. I mean you might believe hell-met was wrong, but jesus christ it was a 1 day ban, all you've done now by coming to this site is made yourself look like a jackass. Ohh also, thanks for reinforcing what everyone always says about 2fort "lols 2fort" thanks for fucking it up for the rest of us.
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - ibby - Sep 22, 2010
Hell-met didn't have Admin at the time you said he allegedly kicked you. You've now lost all your credibility.
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - OmegaZero_Alpha - Sep 22, 2010
jerclay Wrote:Sorry, you can't pick and choose which parts you want. It's either INTENDED to be overpowered or it's an EXPLOIT to use per your definition. You're the one that stated unintended = exploit, not me.
But good effort in trying to separate Robin Walker's opinion from the devs in general, despite suggesting an email to Robin Walker will close the door on this. Nice touch.
It wasn't INTENDED to be overpowered. My god you have no clue how making a video game works.
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - jerclay - Sep 22, 2010
ibby Wrote:Hell-met didn't have Admin at the time you said he allegedly kicked you. You've now lost all your credibility.
And when was that? I stated it earlier, but honestly, I don't remember exactly when, so I picked something a bit back since I don't remember it being anytime very recent.
Look, I'm willing to buy my theory in it being personal is just inconclusive, and he's in that heavyhanded option I mentioned earlier, but don't act as if this was a typical and well thought-out response to what I was doing.
OmegaZero_Alpha Wrote:It wasn't INTENDED to be overpowered. My god you have no clue how making a video game works.
That's my point. It was UNINTENDED to be overpowered and it's not an EXPLOIT to use. ie, not all unintended things are an exploit when willfully used. That third option I mentioned earlier, and that you apparently missed.
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Rostov - Sep 22, 2010
This(short) video pretty much sums up how I'm trying to follow this thread.
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1928638
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Snarf - Sep 22, 2010
More like this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgN4qE_0Ngw
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - jerclay - Sep 22, 2010
Yes yes, me adding to the thread is whatever insult you're conveying in the vid clip, you adding to the thread is edgy. We get it.
Banned: Consistently exploiting architectural flaws - Snarf - Sep 22, 2010
Your definition of edgy is almost as bad as your definition of exploit.