Jul 03, 2010, 01:53 AM
No it shouldn't, these "arguments" are always hilarious.
I was a commando you know.
My computer is filthy
Jul 03, 2010, 06:57 AM
Rostov Wrote:I thought poisoning the well was a type of leading arguement.
e.g, Anyone who thinks A is B. You believe in B, therefore you must be A
Anyone who thinks capitalism is good is a pig. You believe in capitalism, therefore you are a pig. End of arguement.
That's a false dichotomy.
Poisoning the well is introducing irrelevant into an argument in order to turn people against the arguer.[/quote]
Rostov says, --->For example, if one starts an argument with "Everything I say is correct, no matter what you say", the well is poisoned and nothing a person says (be it true or false) will matter by the initiator's definition.
'nuff said?
Jul 03, 2010, 09:17 AM
KratosStrength Wrote:I'd assume you're just enemies after seeing his signature.
Not as much enemies as him trying too hard.
Rostov Wrote:For example, if one starts an argument with "Everything I say is correct, no matter what you say", the well is poisoned and nothing a person says (be it true or false) will matter by the initiator's definition.
'nuff said?
And yes.
/sarcasm
Jul 03, 2010, 10:16 AM
bro if i tried any less my try level would be in the negatives
The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State.
Jul 03, 2010, 04:57 PM
WombRaider Wrote:bro if i tried any less my try level would be in the negatives
Reality Wrote:80% of his posts are shitty troll attempts
Even his signature is a shot at me
Cool reality you have there. Your 'super model girlfriends' definitely wouldn't approve.
/sarcasm
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)