[jwstohr]

We don't need to pull out,

That's what SHE said.

[OmegaZero_Alpha]

It is continuing because the area is unstable and has no government and if we left it would revert into a state of anarchy.

We don't need to pull out, we just need foreign support from a country that isn't hated with a passion by the people we are policing.

And by who's definition was it in a supposed state of anarchy previously?

I never said that and it wasn't, But we had a dictator intentionally slaughtering more civilians every 'election' year than we did in the entire war.

[supercommierussian]

It is continuing because the area is unstable and has no government and if we left it would revert into a state of anarchy.

We don't need to pull out, we just need foreign support from a country that isn't hated with a passion by the people we are policing.

And by who's definition was it in a supposed state of anarchy previously?

I never said that and it wasn't, But we had a dictator intentionally slaughtering more civilians every 'election' year than we did in the entire war.

This war illegal. It's illegal to invade another country because it's dictator killing own people. That's why they made up the WMD. I bet you still believe that Saddam had WMD... .

[OmegaZero_Alpha]

I bet you believe that Herbert Hoover invented the motorcycle and used it to transport all of the troops across the ocean on a tight rope, while we are making up each others arguments.

[Snarf]

I like that belief can i believe in that too?

[Norrec]

This war illegal. It's illegal to invade another country because it's dictator killing own people. That's why they made up the WMD. I bet you still believe that Saddam had WMD... .

WMDs... lmao... this was just unfinished business between Saddam and Bush Sr.

[OmegaZero_Alpha]

The war isn't illegal. We went to war with Afghanistan because they aided the Taliban in an act of war.

Iraq proceeded in aiding the Taliban and we went in and stomped their asses, too.

It looks like iran wants some too.

[Rostov]

[quote=OmegaZero_Alpha]

This war illegal. It's illegal to invade another country because it's dictator killing own people. .

First thing they teach you in international politics, "The global political system is governed by anarchy." By that it is meant that there is no enforcement mechanism that can be applied to a sovereign state in the same way the police enforce the will of a sovereign state within its own borders.

Sanctions? International Court of Justice? Sure, if the UN Security agrees with no veto from its permanent members and/or a UN member 'agrees' to be 'bound' by the UN. Most(if not all) nations would rather handle their affairs through bilateral/multilateral arrangements. The war, while it might be illegal, is not going to earn the U.S. any 'punishment'(or criminal/civil sanctions).

P.S., How legal was the Russian 'war' in Chechnya? Close to 100,000 Chechens killed, most in the largest carpet bombing raid since Dresden WWII..... How would you justify that at the ICJ??

[supercommierussian]

[quote=OmegaZero_Alpha]

This war illegal. It's illegal to invade another country because it's dictator killing own people. .

First thing they teach you in international politics, "The global political system is governed by anarchy." By that it is meant that there is no enforcement mechanism that can be applied to a sovereign state in the same way the police enforce the will of a sovereign state within its own borders.

Sanctions? International Court of Justice? Sure, if the UN Security agrees with no veto from its permanent members and/or a UN member 'agrees' to be 'bound' by the UN. Most(if not all) nations would rather handle their affairs through bilateral/multilateral arrangements. The war, while it might be illegal, is not going to earn the U.S. any 'punishment'(or criminal/civil sanctions).

Compare apples with oranges. Internal politics and international.

P.S., How legal was the Russian 'war' in Chechnya? Close to 100,000 Chechens killed, most in the largest carpet bombing raid since Dresden WWII..... How would you justify that at the ICJ??

Apples with oranges. Internal politics and international.

[OmegaZero_Alpha]

Cool double standards.